<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>John McCollum &#187; usability</title>
	<atom:link href="http://johnmc.co/llum/category/usability/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://johnmc.co/llum</link>
	<description>Muddling through since 1980</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 21:12:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Select multi lists suck!</title>
		<link>http://johnmc.co/llum/select-multi-lists-suck/</link>
		<comments>http://johnmc.co/llum/select-multi-lists-suck/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 22:13:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[jquery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HTML]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[select lists]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnmccollum.co.uk/?p=73</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was recently involved in a project where there were two multi-select lists involved, with a big number of options &#8211; around 300 in each. These things are a usability nightmare: The user has to ctrl-click to select multiple options (&#8216;where&#8217;s the central key?&#8217;) A stray click will unselect everything already selected (Critically important on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnmc.co%2Fllum%2Fselect-multi-lists-suck%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnmc.co%2Fllum%2Fselect-multi-lists-suck%2F&amp;style=normal" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>I was recently involved in a project where there were two multi-select lists involved, with a big number of options &#8211; around 300 in each.</p>
<p>These things are a usability nightmare:</p>
<ul>
<li>The user has to ctrl-click to select multiple options (&#8216;where&#8217;s the central key?&#8217;)</li>
<li>A stray click will unselect everything already selected (Critically important on a site sign-up form)</li>
<li>They are just plain ugly</li>
</ul>
<p>So the workarounds I&#8217;ve been trialling?</p>
<p><a href="http://abeautifulsite.net/notebook/62">Jquery multiselect plugin</a> &#8211; Very nice plugin that solves all three of the problems above. One problem however &#8211; it was taking over a minute for my page to load in Firefox!</p>
<p>Interestingly, Chrome displayed the page in under 5 seconds. Guess that new javascript engine is a fast as they say&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://johnmccollum.co.uk/select.html">Half-assed Jquery solution I cobbled together for fun</a> &#8211; This lets the user use a single click instead of a control click on multi-select lists. Solves problem one and two, problem three would still need someone with more artistic leanings working on it. Oh, and it doesn&#8217;t work in IE. Told you it was half-assed.</p>
<p>Current favourite option &#8211; A div with overflow hidden, full of checkboxes. Sort of solves the main problems, but still not ideal.</p>
<p>How would you deal with this interface problem? I&#8217;d love to hear your suggestions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://johnmc.co/llum/select-multi-lists-suck/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New search engine launches, sucks</title>
		<link>http://johnmc.co/llum/new-search-engine-launches-sucks/</link>
		<comments>http://johnmc.co/llum/new-search-engine-launches-sucks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 20:29:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cuil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnmccollum.co.uk/?p=29</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today sees the launch of Cuil (pronounced &#8216;Cool&#8217;), a brand new search engine launched by ex-Google employees. So far, the launch has not gone smoothly. Having tested it quite a bit today I can report the following: It&#8217;s really, really slow just now. Probably just teething issues, but not a good sign. &#8220;No results because [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnmc.co%2Fllum%2Fnew-search-engine-launches-sucks%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnmc.co%2Fllum%2Fnew-search-engine-launches-sucks%2F&amp;style=normal" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>Today sees the launch of <a href="http://www.cuil.com">Cuil</a> (pronounced &#8216;Cool&#8217;), a brand new search engine launched by ex-Google employees.</p>
<p>So far, the launch has not gone smoothly. Having tested it quite a bit today I can report the following:</p>
<ul>
<li>It&#8217;s really, really slow just now. Probably just teething issues, but not a good sign.</li>
<li>&#8220;No results because of high load&#8230;Due to excessive load, our servers didn&#8217;t return results. Please try your search again.&#8221;</li>
<li>Nasty interface. A three column layout for results by default (ew!) means that I don&#8217;t immediately know where there most relevant results are. I&#8217;ve been trained to read search results top to bottom since the days of AltaVista &#8211; I am supposed to be reading left to right? One column then the other?</li>
<li>Related searches at the top, and related categories on the right. Wha? Where? Who?</li>
<li>Their about us page returns a 403 forbidden error!</li>
<li>Thumbnails for search results that don&#8217;t relate to the content (for example, <a href="http://www.cuil.com/search?q=superstring+theory">superstring theory</a> &#8211; NSFW! Well spotted by digger <a href="http://digg.com/users/crypticlabs">Crypticlabs</a>)</li>
</ul>
<p>The performance issue on day one are forgivable; the usability issues less so. With excessive AJAX, and the issues mentioned above, the site is uncomfortable to use, at best.</p>
<p>Having said all that, I hope they do manage to provide an alternative to Google; everyone will benefit from a more competitive search market (rather than <a href="http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/05/google-market-share-up-again.html">Google eating an ever-increasing slice of the pie</a>), and their committment to privacy is laudable.</p>
<p>However, they&#8217;ve got a long, long way to go before they can match the power and simplicity of the big G.</p>
<p>Have you tried Cuil yet? What have your experiences been like?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://johnmc.co/llum/new-search-engine-launches-sucks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Further Digg advert woes</title>
		<link>http://johnmc.co/llum/further-digg-advert-woes/</link>
		<comments>http://johnmc.co/llum/further-digg-advert-woes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 21:59:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[usability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnmccollum.co.uk/2008/03/12/further-digg-advert-woes/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Digg&#8216;s users have been complaining for months about the horrendous adverts plaguing the site. Most notably the type of advert that shakes, flashes, and tries to convince you that &#8220;YOU ARE VISITOR NUMBER 1,000,000!!&#8221;. This type of stuff doesn&#8217;t tend to bother me so much &#8211; I can install adblocker or just plain ignore them. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnmc.co%2Fllum%2Ffurther-digg-advert-woes%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnmc.co%2Fllum%2Ffurther-digg-advert-woes%2F&amp;style=normal" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p><a href="http://digg.com">Digg</a>&#8216;s users have been complaining for months about the horrendous adverts plaguing the site. Most notably the type of advert that shakes, flashes, and tries to convince you that &#8220;YOU ARE VISITOR NUMBER 1,000,000!!&#8221;.</p>
<p>This type of stuff doesn&#8217;t tend to bother me so much &#8211; I can install adblocker or just plain ignore them.</p>
<p>What <strong>does</strong> annoy me, however, is when their adverts break the primary means of navigating the site. Have a look at this:</p>
<p><img height="150" width="450" src="http://johnmccollum.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/digg.jpg" /></p>
<p>Yep, it is now impossible to click on any of the drop down menus &#8216;behind&#8217; the advert. That means that most of the subcategories in Science, Gaming, Lifestyle, Entertainment, Sports, and Offbeat are now off-limits to me. This has been going on for about a week, I think.</p>
<p>I appreciate that advertising is a necessary evil for big sites, but if you sacrifice usability for short term profit, I&#8217;ll be happy to take my disposable income, advert-clicks, and interest elsewhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://johnmc.co/llum/further-digg-advert-woes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
